Arguments We Are Tired of Having

Welcome back to another episode of EM Over Easy. Today, we’re tackling a topic that resonates deeply with many emergency medicine professionals—those repetitive and exhausting arguments that seem to never end. Despite advancements in medical practice and technology, there are still some discussions that we find ourselves having over and over again.

The Never-Ending ABG vs. VBG Debate

One of the most persistent and frustrating arguments in emergency medicine is the arterial blood gas (ABG) versus venous blood gas (VBG) debate. Despite considerable evidence supporting the use of VBGs in many clinical situations, the debate continues to rage on.

Why We Prefer VBGs
  • Less Painful: Drawing a venous sample is generally less painful for patients compared to an arterial puncture.
  • Quicker and Easier: VBGs can be obtained more quickly and easily, especially in a busy emergency department (ED) setting.
  • Sufficient Accuracy: For many conditions, VBGs provide sufficient accuracy for clinical decision-making, such as assessing pH, pCO2, and lactate levels.
The Persistent Resistance

Despite these benefits, resistance remains. Some colleagues insist on ABGs, citing concerns about accuracy for specific parameters like oxygenation. This often leads to repetitive explanations and justifications, draining time and energy that could be better spent on patient care.

The “Just Get an ABG” Mentality

Another related argument is the “just get an ABG” mentality from admitting teams. They often request ABGs as a blanket requirement, regardless of the clinical scenario.

The Real Issue

The core issue here is a lack of trust or understanding about the utility of VBGs. This results in needless debate and delays in patient care.

Colorimetric vs. Waveform Capnography in Resuscitation

In critical scenarios, such as resuscitations, the choice between colorimetric and waveform capnography can spark heated debates. Waveform capnography is more accurate and provides continuous monitoring, yet some practitioners still rely on colorimetric devices.

Why Waveform Capnography?
  • Continuous Monitoring: Provides real-time feedback on ventilation and circulation.
  • More Accurate: Reduces the risk of false positives/negatives.
The Resistance

Some resist adopting waveform capnography due to familiarity with colorimetric devices or a lack of training on the newer technology. This resistance can compromise patient care and lead to unnecessary arguments.

The Importance of Timely Urine Samples

Collecting urine samples can be another point of contention, especially when dealing with time-sensitive cases.

Common Frustrations
  • Delayed Samples: Waiting for patients to provide a sample can slow down the diagnostic process.
  • Lack of Urgency: Some staff may not prioritize obtaining samples promptly, leading to delays.

Magnesium Levels in the ED

Magnesium levels are another area of frequent debate. While some argue they’re essential, others see them as unnecessary in many cases.

The Argument
  • Pro-Magnesium: Useful for diagnosing and managing specific conditions like preeclampsia or severe asthma.
  • Anti-Magnesium: Often seen as overkill for routine cases.

The Undifferentiated Admit

Lastly, the argument over admitting undifferentiated patients is a daily struggle. The expectation that all diagnoses must be fully vetted before admission overlooks the complexity of many cases.

The Reality
  • Complex Patients: Many patients present with multiple, overlapping issues that can’t be fully resolved in the ED.
  • Hospital’s Role: The hospital exists to provide extended care and further diagnostic work-up, not just to house patients with clear-cut diagnoses.

Conclusion

These recurring arguments can be frustrating, but they’re also a testament to the complexity and evolving nature of emergency medicine. It’s crucial to continue educating and advocating for best practices, even if it means having the same conversations multiple times.

If you’re tired of these arguments too, you’re not alone. Let’s work together to push for evidence-based practices and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our care.

Call to Action

Want to join the conversation and share your experiences? Sign up for our newsletter and stay updated with the latest discussions and advancements in emergency medicine. Together, we can make a difference.

Looking For More?

More from Andy, John, Tanner, and Drew: Be sure to subscribe to our newsletter for more information about what the team is reading, listening to and so much more!

More of your favorite EM Over Easy content: As always, you can find more of your favorite EM Over Easy content by following us on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram! Also, please rate us on your favorite podcasting app or by visiting MedForums.

As the OFFICIAL podcast of the ACOEP, check out the ACOEP by visiting acoep.org to learn more and sign up for one of their many CME offerings.

Arguments We Are Tired of Having

Leave a Reply

Discover more from EM Over Easy

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading